Which World? Lecture Six

This post offers a shorter summary of Professor Kathryn Tanner’s final lecture, after which I have invited three contributors to help us conclude the series: Professor David Fergusson will offer his ‘vote of thanks;’ Dr. Lydia Schumacher will contribute her statement from the New College Giffords seminar; and a postgraduate student, Rev. Russell Almon, will engage with the content of this final lecture. As always, I would welcome your own comments, either on this particular lecture or on the series as a whole. The lecture video is available at this link.

Gifford #6 Still 2 copy

Kathryn Tanner begins her final lecture by reiterating her intent for this series, namely, to dissociate Protestant Christianity from the new work ethic of finance-disciplined capitalism. To this end, she challenges the moralising and individuating effects of the new spirit of capitalism. Tanner cites examples such as performance pay, in which individuals are singled out through competition, and state welfare provision, in which people are appraised on the basis of future benefits they might provide society (rather than as part of a class, say). In these ways, finance capitalism places one in a competitive relationship with others, a dynamic that extends to more and more people with increasingly direct forms of rivalry. Even so, one remains dependent, for the ability to profit depends in ‘an unusually intense way on others,’ that is, whether they buy or decline to buy (so long as their choice is not ahead of your own!). Continue reading

Introducing the New Spirit of Capitalism: Lecture One

We had a lively opening Gifford lecture with Professor Tanner at the Business School tonight! If you missed it, you can review the ‘live’ rendition at the Twitter hashtag #GiffordsEdAlso, as of Wednesday, May 4th, the lecture video has been available at this linkFor this and subsequent discussion threads, consider responding to the following questions:

  • Is there a technical term, from either economics or theology, that you’d like to hear clarified? Professor Tanner has already covered a lot of ground and this is a good place to define our terms.
  • How does finance-dominated capitalism, as Tanner described it and you experience it, differ from the industrial capitalism that was the subject of Weber’s critique?
  • What element of Tanner’s proposed ‘Protestant anti-work ethic’ would you like to hear elaborated in the lectures to come?

Gifford #1 Still 4 copy

To get us started, Melanie McConnell, a postgraduate student from New College, has posted some thoughts in our reply section. I’ve also heard some interest about how capitalism shapes our current institutions of higher education, both in the final question of tonight’s Q&A and through comments on social media. To join the thread, see my post on how to offer a comment.
Continue reading

Engage our 2016 Theme: ‘Christianity & the New Spirit of Capitalism’

In Professor Kathryn Tanner’s introduction to this year’s Giffords theme, she states that contemporary capitalism can ‘hinder the development of any critical perspective on it.’ Given this situation, we are looking forward to her lectures as a mode of resistance to the influence of finance-dominated capitalism on our societies, workplaces, and ‘spiritualities’.

This weblog offers the opportunity to further develop our critical perspective by engaging Professor Tanner’s lecture content online. I will be serving as this year’s blog host (read my profile), which means that I will be posting initial thoughts on each of the lectures here, drawing on questions submitted by audience members. I will also be inviting various contributors to post reflections on what they have heard.

Join us by sharing your insights on Professor Tanner’s lectures on this blog. As the effects of capitalism are pervasive in our cultures and religions, we are looking for a wide spectrum of voices to achieve truly critical leverage. In other words, we are not only seeking contributions from members of the academy, nor is discussion limited to those who practice a particular faith. Here are a few ways to take part in our conversation:

Plan to attend one or more of the Giffords, which take place from May 2-12, 2016 at the University of Edinburgh. A description of each lecture is available here, alongside details about location, times, and tickets.

Pose a question at the lecture itself, either directly or via email and twitter at #GiffordsEd. Questions submitted electronically will be added to the queue during the discussion period to follow each lecture, as well as being integrated into my blog posts.

Write your reflections on our discussion thread in the space between lectures–perhaps later that evening, perhaps during the next couple days. You’ll see an opportunity at the base of each post to ‘leave a reply.’ If you’re currently a blogger, posting here will open up your own website to others as a means to continue the conversation.

Open up our discussion to others through social media. This is an important way that we can share the resources of the academy more broadly, as not everyone will be able to attend. Use the icons attached to each post as well as twitter hashtag #GiffordsEd.

Read key works in advance.
Professor Tanner makes the bold statement that she plans to ‘reverse the project’ of German sociologist Max Weber’s Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. The allusion in her lecture title is clear, so it would be useful to refresh on that classic work, or encounter it for the first time, to gauge whether she succeeds.
As for Professor Tanner’s own work, she has written on markets previously in Economy of Grace (2005). She is also well known for her book Christ the Key (2010), which offers a central element of her larger project. There is currently a group of postgraduate students at New College reading through the latter, so you may want to take the cue from them.

However you choose to engage, I look forward to working together to develop critical perspectives on, indeed to counteract, the ways we have been shaped by global capitalism.